Friday 4 November 2011

Connecting With Anything

Usually when an individuals speaks off connectivity, it all relates back to a communication device such as phones, computers, GPS and etc. However, in connectivity not only these particular devices are involved, but any other things one could find laying around the house or in college, even one's work place. An example would be such as the car alarm key, shoes, gloves, shirts, and etc which could relate to us in a way that it will affect us in a particular way. For example, some shoes today has the ability to measure one's heart rate and give the user a result whether or not that particular person is overweight or underweight and gives advice in having to achieve the perfect body shape which anyone could ask for through exercising. However, there are already such product in the market and is definitely scary to have objects such as shoes, gloves which usually one just wear them for comfort, able to talk to the user. It's as though the object is particularly talking to you. 


In fact another, point to relate back to object talking to us are us talking to objects. With the emergence of Twitter and blogs, who are these people actually talking to whenever they post something up upon into the internet. Looking into the case of Twitter, one usually updates on their inner thoughts and post it up upon their own Twitter's profile home page but there actually no one in the other side behind the wall, who is actually listening to this particular person's Tweets. Thus, this comes in on a weird scenario between human and communications with the Internet. Even looking at blogs, people are actually just posting stuff upon the internet as though these people are talking to the internet as though it understands the user very much and treat it as a place to release their emotion. 


Looking also at the latest technology implemented by Apple for the IPhone 4S which allows the voice recognition technology that allows users to talk to the Phone to input their message to send to other people. This already is as though asking a person to type out the letter or note for the user. These is in relation to the readings of Julian Bleecker writings, that mentions on the theory of Blogjects that people are communicating or talking with objects but not the usual humans anymore, which includes me as I'm typing this particular blog post. It's alright to talk to these objects and share one inner thoughts with these objects as an emotional release as sometimes no one really will appreciate and spend the time to listen to one's complains or thoughts as most people rather focus on their own issues rather than others. 


The problem arises when these objects which we are communicating with, one day decides to stop working with us and starts a rebel as in future these objects may have their own A.I (Artificial Intelligence). The world where a scenario is similar to the movie of Terminator that objects start to rebel against the human race as the objects believe that they are more superior and better. This will definitely be an issue, which could be worrying that may upset the balance between mankind. However, is definitely will be interesting being able to communicate with any of your own objects and not having the issue of these objects controlling or taking control over the master. Ever realize sometimes when you use your own item or equipment you feel more comfortable and have a more efficient usage of the object for example, having to type on your own laptop is much more faster as compared to typing on a friend's laptop which you are not familiarize with, what does this actually mean? Is it because in a way we have understood the object as we have already been using and communicating with it for a long time? or is it because we have understand the object inner feelings such as it has a soul... 


Writings are based on the readings of Julian Bleecker "A Manifesto for Networked Objects — Cohabiting with Pigeons, Arphids and Aibos in the Internet of Things". 

Thursday 3 November 2011

Google and The Android Operating Software

Astoundingly compared to the past, phones have definitely evolved to a whole different level with the concept of convergence in place as discussed earlier in the older blog post, it became a device which have many different type of functions capability all in one small single handheld device which today known as the Smartphones. Phones today are somewhat similar to one could refer to as a miniature computer as well which gives the exact same function of a normal computer but the difference is that it can now fit into one's pocket. Revolving around this term of "computers" Google has bought over the Android Operating Software in July 2005 and have given a different aim compared to Apple, whereby the aim of Google was to open a whole new kind of wireless interface based on the open source Linux Operating Software. 

As a mobile phone user, currently am only using the older version Sony Ericsson operating software which no longer used by the company in the newer phones developed by the organization that had moved to the Android OS for the newer model phones. Currently have been on the search for a new mobile phone to replace my older Sony Ericsson C902 model, at first was only looking at the specs of the variety of Smartphones in the market today and not focusing on the Operating Software. Then as I tested my friends Smartphones, they as the consumer have already know the pros and cons of their own phone which will give me an idea of what my next phone would be. Previously when buying a phone, it usually focuses on the specs of a particular phone, whether does it have a good camera, a good speaker, a good space of storage and whether does it lags? today is different as the method of purchase of phone by users also now discuss on the particular type of operating software as different operating software have their own particular application store which have special applications just for that particular phone software as well compatibility with the phone's specs. 

If I were to choose between the operating softwares, I would prefer the Nokia Operating software as compared to the rest. Android will come in second place of my choice of operating software. Mainly because due to the fact that I would like to have more open source applications rather than having to pay for each application as compared to the IOS application store or more commonly known as Apple App Store. In addition, I choose the Symbian OS by Nokia as well is because that Nokia been in the Phone industry for a very long time and is one of the largest established companies in the mobile phone industry which gives me great trust towards the products and services done by them. The way Apple IOS is implying is as though information is controlled in a way which to gain this specific information, one must pay to attain the information as compared to the Symbian and Android software. The main reason Android is still one of my choice is due to the fact of the founders of Google, Andy Rubin and his team of coming up with a long term vision of establishing a marketing strategy which focuses in the future development of the wireless interface as a better and more comfortable efficient for information searching and internet browsing through these mobile devices. Given the combination of 34 established companies collaborating with Google, and also in the future definitely there will be an increase collaboration with the Google corporation in order to make a better wireless interface for the consumer to use. So having more people collaborating especially in the terms of the industry, definitely the Android OS have still lots of improvements to be made and even today the Android OS is still developing very much more which gives me hope that it would definitely have lots more variety of functionality in a particular phone to make it one of the greatest phone to ever have in one's hands.  

Writing are based readings on Daniel Roth's article in Wired Magazine on "Google's Open Source Android OS Will Free the Wireless Web"